این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Future of Medical Education Journal، جلد ۶، شماره ۲، صفحات ۲۶-۳۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی The Comparison of Survey Participants about Promoted of Faculty Members in the Area of Education Quality Assessment in Mashhad Medical School
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Background: Every year a number of Iran’s faculty members in Medical science universities got promoted to a higher scientific rank with respect to their history of administrative and scientific services and research and educational activities. One of the faculty promotion criteria is assessing the quality of their educational activities which encompass four areas (training, professional and social ethics, and class management). In Medical Science University, Professor’s assessments will be performed by students, colleagues, head of the department, hospital educational assistant as well as self-assessment. This study has the aim of examining the corresponding rate of evaluators’ opinions regarding the assessed quality of promoted professors’ educational activities in the Medical Science University from the year1390 to 1394. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 160 promoted faculty members from fundamental and clinical group, from the year 1390 to 1394, were chosen as a case study. However, since there were a limited number of professors, the whole society was considered as a sample by the census. The data collection was based on some questionnaires that their validity and stability were confirmed by the Minister of Health and Medical education and were adjusted based on a Likert Scale (from very good to very bad).These questionnaires were filled by learners, heads of departments, colleagues, hospital, educational assistant as well as self-assessment. Then the given scores were separated elicited through medical science assessment expert and the information was analyzed by SPSS (11.5) software with a statistical test of the correlation coefficient. Results: investigating the correlation coefficient of students’ colleagues, head of the department, hospital and university educational assistant opinions regarding the assessment of promoting faculty members show that their ideas display no meaningful correspondence and agreement in the area of education (P=0. 07). In other assessment areas, there is a meaningful correspondence of evaluators’ opinions. Conclusions: our findings reflect that there is a meaningful correspondence of evaluators’ opinions except in the area of education. We can refer to evaluators’ lack of, accurate understanding of the professors’ teaching styles as one of the main reasons of such in correspondence.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله evaluation, Education, Faculty, Learner
نویسندگان مقاله علی اکبر حیدری | aliakbar heidari
school of medicine, mashhad university of medical sciences, mashhad, iran

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد (Mashhad university of medical sciences)

امیرحسین کیذوری | amir hosein kayzouri
hakim sabzevari university, sabzevar, iran

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری (Hakim sabzevari university)

نازنین زمانیان | nazanin zamanian
school of medicine, mashhad university of medical sciences, mashhad, iran

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد (Mashhad university of medical sciences)

نشانی اینترنتی http://fmej.mums.ac.ir/article_7512.html
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده Original Article
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات