این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
طب و تزکیه، جلد ۲۲، شماره ۲، صفحات ۷۱-۷۶
عنوان فارسی مقایسه ی اثرات کلین کیی دهانشویه های ایرشا آنتی سپتیک و لیسترین آنتی سپتیک در درمان ژنژیویت خفیف تا متوسط
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله جمعیت،سالمندی،هزینه ها،ایران،
عنوان انگلیسی Comparative clinical effects of Irsha antiseptic and listerine antiseptic mouthrinses on the mild to moderate gingivits
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Introduction:Gingivitis is the most common form of periodontal diseases. Dental plaque is known asan essential cause of gingivitis. Because of the inability of many people to maintain adequate levels ofplaque control through mechanical methods, Use of antimicrobial mouth rinses has been recommendedas an adjunct to usual oral hygiene. Aim of present study was to determine the clinical anti plaque and antigingivitis effects of Irsha and Listerine antiseptic mouth rinses.Method and material: This clinical study was a double-blinde, randomized, 21day trial which included30 patients ranging in age from 18-24, with mild to moderate gingivitis. Exclusion criteria included previousscaling and polishing, effective systemic disease on our study process and history of smoking, etc.Plaque index(silness & loe 1964), modified gingival index(lobene 1986), papillary bleeding index(saxer& muhelmann 1975) were scored at baseline. Participants were assigned by a random code to one ofthree groups: Irsha antiseptic, Listerine antiseptic, normal saline (control group). All solutions were keptin the same bottles. At baseline, participants were refrain from all oral hygiene procedures for a period 72hours during which they rinsed twice daily for 30 seconds with 15 ml of one of the mouthwashes. At day3, all volunteers were recalled and we record mention indexes. Subjects of control group received scalingand dental prophylaxis and excluded from study. Subjects in Irsha and Listerine antiseptic groups followtheir usual oral hygiene habits in addition to mouth rinsing. Subjects return to clinic after 2 weeks for finalassessment of indices. Then they received scaling and dental prophylaxis.Resuls: Both Irsha and Listerine antiseptic reduced papillay bleeding index. In both groups plaque indexwas reduced when mouth rinses were used at supplements to mechanical oral hygiene methods. OnlyListerine antiseptic was effective in improving modified gingival index when it was used as an adjunct tousual oral hygiene methods.Conclusion: Both Irsha antiseptic and Listerine antiseptic were effective in reducting plaque andgingivitis. But Listerine antiseptic was more effective in improving gingival inflammation.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
نشانی اینترنتی http://www.tebvatazkiye.ir/article_79456_5c56fa12b4c8d3609a4b473566aec528.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/148/article-148-1072991.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات