این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery، جلد ۷، شماره ۲، صفحات ۹۱-۱۰۴
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Comparative Study of the Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis. Evidence from a Systematic Review
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) also known as tennis elbow is a common disease of middle-aged population.Surgery is a treatment of choice in patients not responded to the conservative management. Open and arthroscopicrelease are the two main choices for LE surgery; however, an overall consensus is not available. This study was aimedto compare the clinical outcomes after conventional open and arthroscopic procedures.Methods: An electronic search of databases including, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, andScopus was conducted to identify all eligible studies describing the post-operative clinical outcomes of patients withLE, up to October 2018. All studies considering the non-pediatric cases who received at least 6-month preoperativeconservative treatment and were followed more than 6 months after surgery were included. Data on patient satisfaction,functional outcomes, pain, and complication rates, were extracted for each study. If appropriate, the meta-analysiswas performed to combine the results for all outcomes that were reported in a minimum of 3 studies utilizing the samesurgical technique.Results: A total of 34 eligible articles including 15 open studies, 13 arthroscopic studies, and 6 studies in bothtechniques were enrolled. Studies were from different parts of the world with a whole sample size of 1508 cases.Various outcome measuring methods including Quick DASH and VAS, and different clinical outcomes were reported.The results indicated no significant difference between arthroscopic and open surgery methods in terms of VAS,DASH score, time for returning to work, overall outcomes, and patients' satisfaction (P >0.05). However, postoperativecomplications were significantly higher in the open group when compared with the arthroscopic procedure (57.3%vs 33.4% P=0.001).Conclusion: The present study suggests that despite no superiority for each techniques regarding the pain relief,subjective function, and better rehabilitation, arthroscopic method have been associated with less complications.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله | Pouria Pasdar
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran


| Hasan Mehrad Majd
Clinical Research Unit, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.


| Ali Moradi
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
نشانی اینترنتی http://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_12340.html
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/328/article-328-1285404.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات