این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
چهارشنبه 26 آذر 1404
Iranian Heart Journal
، جلد ۱۹، شماره ۱، صفحات ۳۰-۳۶
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between Coronary CT Angiography and Conventional Coronary Angiography
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging methodwith a high diagnostic value and minimal complications for evaluating coronary arteries.Therefore, in cases with low and moderate probabilities of coronary artery disease, CCTA canbe a good alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Previous studies with 64-slice CTA have tried to determine its diagnostic accuracy compared with CCA as the goldstandard. In this survey, we compared the results of 256-slice CCTA with CTA.Method: The present cross-sectional descriptive study evaluated 53 patients (36 men) undergoingCCTA and then CCA (except for 4 patients with pervious CCAs). Our primary goal was tocompare the 2 imaging methods for the evaluation of coronary lesions and their runoff.Results: In the coronary artery bypass graft group, the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for the arterialgraft lesions (left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending) had 72.73% sensitivity,100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 84.2% negative predictive value and itsdiagnostic accuracy for the venous graft lesions had 100% sensitivity, 80% to 100% specificity,80% to 100% positive predictive value, and 66.4% to 100% negative predictive value. Aproposrunoff (adequacy of perfusion), CCTA had 100% sensitivity, 63.64% specificity, 80% positivepredictive value, and 100% negative predictive value in the arterial grafts and 54% to 100%sensitivity and 100% specificity in the venous grafts. In the percutaneous coronary interventiongroup, CCTA had 90% specificity, and 75% positive predictive value, and 0% negativepredictive value in the differentiation of significant from nonsignificant in-stent restenoses.Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA in determining the severity of arterial graft stenosesand their runoff was similar to that reported in previous studies with 64-slice CTA. Strikingly,CCTA had low sensitivity for significant in-stent restenosis.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
Coronary CT angiography, Conventional coronary angiography
نویسندگان مقاله
Hanieh Nejadbahram |
Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Majid Kiavar |
Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Shabnam Madadi |
Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
نشانی اینترنتی
http://journal.iha.org.ir/article_82802_ce049571481632dae9f24dd0e17805cf.pdf
فایل مقاله
اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/162/article-162-1423882.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات