این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility، جلد ۸، شماره ۲.۵، صفحات ۹-۹
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی I-22: A Critique on "Consent to Medical Interventions"In Penal Code of Iran
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Informed consent is central to the doctor-patient relationship and especially to respect the autonomy of the patient that is one of the four principles of biomedical ethics. According to article 190 of Civil Code "consent of both parties is an essential provision for a contract to be made" and according to the definition of contract under Article 183 of the same code, it seems that the doctor-patient relationship is a contractual relationship regardless of its kind. In addition to these statements and despite the fact that article158 (e) of Penal Code Amendment 2013 of Iran has referred to consent to medical interventions, article 495 section 1 states that: "if a doctor has not been negligent or has not committed malpractice, he is not responsible for the harm, even if he has not obtained the "relief from responsibility "(bara'a) form from the patient. In essence, such statement invalidates the consent in medical interventions. Treating a patient per se (with or without the patient's consent) is recognized as an exemption on responsibility of a doctor. Any medical intervention without patient's consent, especially when the patient is competent to give consent or refuse a treatment, is not ethically defensible. This is violating the patient's autonomy. Thus, some considerations need to be made about consent in medical interventions in order to protect the patient's autonomy in laws of Iran.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
نشانی اینترنتی http://ijfs.ir/journal/article/abstract/3807
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات