این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases، جلد ۱۳، شماره ۵، صفحات ۳۰۰-۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Percutaneous biopsy of kidney; comparison between prone position and sitting position
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Introduction: Percutaneous kidney biopsy has been established as a safe, reliable and minimally invasive method. This study aims to describe the author's experience with biopsy of the kidney and to compare the results in sitting position versus prone in terms of the complication rate . Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: prone and sitting position according to the clinician's and patient's preference. Followed by kidney biopsy, a questionnaire was completed. Then, data and the mean number of glomeruli in each group were compared. Results : Apart from sweat, presumably due to the prone position, no significant differences were found regarding the side effects including dizziness, seizure, nausea, and vomiting between the two groups. The number of glomeruli was not significantly different between two groups. Conclusion : In comparison with the prone position, kidney biopsy at sitting position is more comfortable at least for patients who seems couldn't tolerate prone position. We recommend sitting position for kidney biopsy owing to the low side effects rate of this diagnostic technique. 
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله | Manouchehr Amini


| Mohammad Reza Ganji


| Iraj Najafi


| Monir-Sadat Hakemi


| Taiebeh Soleymanian


| Fatemeh Yaghoubi


| Farahnaz Tavakoli


| Vida Sheikh


| Atefeh Yousefi


| Ali Akbar Afrasiab


| Ali Movassaghi


| Hossein Amini


نشانی اینترنتی http://www.ijkd.org/index.php/ijkd/article/view/4323
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده ORIGINAL | Kidney Diseases
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات