این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
محیط شناسی، جلد ۴۰، شماره ۴، صفحات ۱۰۳۵-۱۰۵۰
عنوان فارسی کاربرد روش طرح- فرایند- نتایج (PPR) در ارزیابی طرح‌های شهری
چکیده فارسی مقاله تاکنون روش‌های متعددی برای ارزیابی طرح‌های شهری معرفی شده، اما در این میان به روش‌های ارزیابی جامع و سیستماتیک کمتر توجه شده است. در سال‌های اخیر روش طرح - فرایند- نتایج (PPR) به‌منزلۀ روش ارزیابی جامع و سیستماتیک و بر پایۀ روش سیاست- طرح/برنامه- اجرا- فرایند (PPIP) در ارزیابی طرح‌های شهری معرفی شده است. روش حاضر که در سال 2009 الویرا و پینهو پیشنهاد کردند، برای ارزیابی جامع طرح‌های شهری است که به همۀ ابعاد طرح‌های شهری توجه می‌کند و در ارزیابی پیش، حین و پس از اجرا کاربرد دارد و تاکنون در ارزیابی طرح‌های توسعۀ شهری در شهرهای لیسبون و پورتو به کار گرفته شده است. در مقالۀ حاضر عناصر کلیدی روش طرح -فرایند- نتایج شامل: معیارها، زیرمعیارها، منابع داده و تکنیک‌های ارزیابی معرفی و کاربرد آن در ارزیابی طرح‌های شهری با به کارگیری این روش در ارزیابی پیش از اجرای طرح توسعۀ اراضی آبشار 2 مشهد تشریح می‌‌شود. نتایج نشان می‌دهد به‌رغم جامعیت روش طرح - فرایند- نتایج، این روش تأکید بیشتری بر بعد کالبدی دارد که با شرایط سیستم شهرسازی در ایران همخوانی بیشتری دارد و می‌تواند در ارزیابی طرح‌های شهری کاربرد مناسبی داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Application of Plan - Process - Results (PPR) method in urban plans evaluation
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله   Introduction So far, many evaluation methodologies for assessing urban plans have been introduced, but comprehensive and systematic evaluation methodologies up to now have received little attention. In recent years the Plan - Process - Results (PPR) approach as a comprehensive and systematic evaluation methodology based on the Policy- Plan/Programme-Implementation-Process(PPIP) methodology has been used in the assessment of urban plans. The PPIP model criteria - conformity, rational process, optimality ex-ante, optimality ex-post and utilisation – in planning the subsequent questions of policy, plan or programme, or the planning process under study and its results are considered. Despite the influence of PPIP model in the planning literature, from the early 1990s to the best of our knowledge PPIP has not been used in real case studies, or not reported but PPR methodology since the two cities, Lisbon and Porto are applied.  In this study we outline the key elements of Plan - Process - Results (PPR) methodology, including criteria, sub-criteria and evaluation techniques/data sources introduced and its application in evaluation of urban plans using this methodology in ex-ante evaluation of Abshar (2) land development plan in Mashhad describes. Methodology Plan - Process - Results (PPR) methodology was developed in 2009 by Oliveira and Pinho for comprehensive evaluation of urban plans that will take into consideration all dimensions of urban plans with greater emphasis on the physical dimension and it used in ex-ante, ongoing ,ex-pose evaluation of urban development plan. This methodology exploit the positive aspects and fixes some weaknesses in the ex-ante evaluation methods, to scrutinize criteria of the Policy- Plan/Programme-Implementation-Process (PPIP) methodology. In this study PPR methodology  used in the ex-ante evaluation of Abshar (2) land development plan in Mashhad by utilizes a number of criteria that relate to the ex-ante dimension of Plan described.   Results Overall, the specific criteria on which the Abshar (2) land development  plan attains the highest scores are the internal coherence  and interpretation of planning system (see Table 5). The specific criteria on which the plan attains the Lowest scores are the participation in plan making.           Table 5. Abshar (2) land development plan: Evaluation results Evaluation techniques /data sources Score Sub-criteria Criteria Reading of the plan   Impact matrices A   Relationships between the objectives and the land uses of the plan Internal coherence   Relationships between the objectives and the urban systems of the plan   Relationships between the objectives and the plan implementation mechanisms Reading of the different versions of the plan and its regulation A   Interpretation in terms of form Interpretation of planning system   Interpretation in terms of substance Reading of the plan SWOT analysis Impact matrices Reading of the newspapers B   Relationships between the needs of the city and the objectives of the plan Relevance   Relationships between the needs of the city and  the land uses and  urban systems   Relationships between the needs of the city and the plan implementation mechanisms Reading of the plan and of other plans for that territory   B   Relationships in terms of objectives ٍExternal coherence   Relationships in terms of territorial   Relationships in terms of implementation Reading of the plan Interviews C   Quantity of participants Participation in plan making   Quality of  participants   Promotion of public participation by the local authority Reading of the different versions of the plan (during the period of its preparation) Interviews   B   Influence of the political power in the plan, as well as in other planning products, processes and structures Plan utilisation   Influence of the plan and of the planning practice in the political power Reading of the plan Interviews B   Evolution of the availability of resources Commitment of resources   Type of resources  available   Relationships between planning performance  and utilization of resources     Conclusions This study aims to demonstrate that despite the difficulties and the complexity of the evaluation of planning action it is possible to evaluate urban plan practice in a comprehensive and systematic way. In this paper Plan - Process - Results (PPR) methodology and its application in the ex-ante evaluation of Abshar (2) land development plan in Mashhad was raised. Overall, the results indicate that a greater emphasis on the physical dimension and providing more of the criteria and data sources this methodology differs from other methodologies and makes fertile ground for managers and urban planners to provide to a more favourable evaluation of the planning and implementation of urban plans are made​​.Moreover, the selection of general and specific criteria, the corresponding evaluation questions, the assessment techniques, and data source indicated comprehensive character of PPR. The limitation of this methodology also requires access to vast sources of data are. Application of the PPR methodology provided not only a sound and substantiated  judgment on the case study under evaluation but also provided the basis for identifying a number of singular and important features in planning practice of Abshar (2) land development plan.  Overall, according to the characteristics and framework of urban planning systeme in Iran of greater emphasis on physical dimension rather than other dimensions of economic, social, environmental, so this methodology is more consistent with the country's urbanism system and can be applied as a comprehensive and systematic evaluation method in assessting planning and implementing urban plans in Iran. Finally the main challenge of evaluation can be described as a dilemma that planning is faced with uncertainty and evaluator must at the same time be able to judge plan, process and their results.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله منوچهر طبیبیان |
استاد گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه تهران (Tehran university)

علی آسوده |
کارشناس ارشد مدیریت شهری، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه تهران (Tehran university)

نشانی اینترنتی http://jes.ut.ac.ir/article_53018_11a6ca60b27ca5075e217ce109afa617.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/1056/article-1056-206979.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات