این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
نامه معماری و شهرسازی، جلد ۲، شماره ۴، صفحات ۲۵-۴۲
عنوان فارسی تحلیلی بر بنای مصلّای شهر رشت
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله نقد تفسیری، هرمنوتیک، نقد معماری، مسجد جامع، مصلّای رشت،
عنوان انگلیسی Analysis of the Building of Mosalla (Public Prayer Place) in Rasht City
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Criticism of the architectural works, which are not very old, is one of the constructive forward lookingcritics that may be effective in positive changes of design methods. Determination of the positive aspectsof an architectural work and the statement of the project proper specifications are the methods requiringarchitectural work criticism. Some of the most important duties of the common critics in this domain arethe extension of better perception and understanding of the space, discrimination of the good and bad, andthe judgment in relation to the architectural work and also the promotion of the project following tosupporting, amendment, and the optimization of the designing approaches in creation of a more desirablespace. In this article, which has been performed on the basis of descriptive- analytic research and withlibrary study method and field investigations, at first, we reviewed the aims of criticism of thearchitectural works and then interpretive (hermeneutic) criticism, i.e. the criticism method used incritization of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayer Place) in Rasht City, was mentioned briefly. The mainpart of the article is related to the statement of the specifications of the building of Mosalla (Public PrayerPlace) in Rasht City that has challenged the building with a view to interpretive (hermeneutic) criticism.At the end part of the article, the positive and negative aspects of the work were mentioned with the aim ofusing the criticism advantages in strengthening of proper methods of design in the future. Also someaspects of designing of the building of Mosalla (Public Prayers Place), which had lasting effects onindividuals' mind, have been distinguished from those aspects, which decrease the space desirability. Atall, the whole all points of design review obtained from criticism do not have equal value in people's mindand all people do not have the same view against the building. On the strength of looking forward fordurability and public acceptance of a building, if it is tried to decrease the negative aspects, attractivenessof the architectural work increases and therefore, the quality of the designed spaces will be improved. Butwith a focus on the large number of the positive or negative aspects of an architectural work, the buildingis considered as qualified or unqualified for attractiveness in people's minds. In relation to the building ofMosalla, the positive aspects were more than the negative ones that caused acceptance and attractivenessof this architectural work in one of the main areas’ of the city.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله مژگان خاکپور |
دانشجوی دکترای پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس (Tarbiat modares university)

حسنعلی پورمند |
استادیار گروه پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس (Tarbiat modares university)

نشانی اینترنتی http://aup.journal.art.ac.ir/article_190_36.html
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/1282/article-1282-231553.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات