این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
سه شنبه 18 آذر 1404
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
، جلد ۱۵، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۸۷-۱۹۵
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Biodiversity Indices and Medically Importance of Ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Background: Ticks are considered as the main vectors for the transmission of various pathogens such as relapsing fever and CCHF to humans. This study was investigated the biodiversity indices and medically importance of ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran during 2015–2019. Methods: Specimens were captured from infested ruminants including cows, sheep, and goats. Additionally, tick collections also were performed on non-domesticated creatures such as turtles, rodents, and hedgehogs. Specimens were identified using valid identification keys. Species diversity, species richness and evenness indices have been calculated to estimate species biodiversity of ticks. Results: A total of 1478 adult ticks were collected. The specimens were from two families: Ixodidae (90.05%) and Argasidae (9.95%), 6 genera and 17 species including: Rhipicephalus sanguineus (55.9%), Rhipicephalus bursa (13.4%), Hyalomma marginatum (9.5%), Hyalomma anatolicum (9.5%), Hyalomma asiaticum (0.2%), Hyalomma aegyptium (0.5%), Hyalomma scupense (1.3%), Hyalomma sp (1.2%), Haemaphysalis sulcata (0.7%), Haemaphysalis erinacea (0.1%), Haemaphysalis inermis (0.1%), Haemaphysalis punctata (0.2%), Haemaphysalis concinna (0.1% Boophilus annulatus (1.2), and Dermacentor marginatus (6.1%) among hard ticks as well as Argas persicus (91.8%) and Argas reflexus (8.2%) amongst soft ticks. Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rh. Bursa, Hy. marginatum and Hy. anatolicum were known as the most frequent species of hard ticks. Tick’s species richness, Shannon diversity index and Simpson index in this area were S= 17, H’= 1.69, D= 0.294 respectively. Conclusion: Based on tick distribution veterinary authority, public health organizations and other officials should act for implementation of disease prevention.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
| Kourosh Arzamani
Vector-borne Diseases Research Center, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
| Abedin Saghafipour
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
| Seyed Ahmad Hashemi
Vector-borne Diseases Research Center, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
| Hassan Vatandoost
Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| Mohammad Alavinia
Vector-borne Diseases Research Center, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran, Toronto Rehabilitation Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| Saber Raeghi
Department of Laboratory Sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran
| Zakyeh Telmadarraiy
Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
نشانی اینترنتی
https://jad.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jad/article/view/1491
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات