این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
پنجشنبه 4 دی 1404
Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma
، جلد ۱۰، شماره ۲، صفحات ۴۹-۵۸
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Trauma Registry Data as a Policy-Making Tool: A Systematic Review on the Research Dimensions
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Objective: To review the research dimensions of trauma registry data on health policy making. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched until July 2020. Keywords were used on the search process included Trauma, Injury, Registry and Research, which were searched by using appropriate search strategies. The included articles had to: 1. be extracted from data related to trauma registries; 2- be written in English; 3- define a time period and a patient population; 4- preferably have more details and policy recommendations; and 5- preferably have a discussion on how to improve diagnosis and treatment. The results obtained from the included studies were qualitatively analyzed using thematic synthesis and comparative tables. Results: In the primary round of search, 19559 studies were retrieved. According to PRISMA statement and also performing quality appraisal process, 30 studies were included in the final phase of analysis. In the final papers’ synthesis, 14 main research domains were extracted and classified in terms of the policy implication and research priority. The domains with the highest frequency were “The relationship between trauma registry data and hospital care protocols for trauma patients” and “The causes of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) due to trauma”. Conclusion: Using trauma registry data as a tool for policy-making could be helpful in several ways, namely increasing the quality of patient care, preventing injuries and decreasing their number, figuring out the details of socioeconomic status effects, and improving the quality of researches in practical ways. Also, follow-up of patients after trauma surgery as one of the positive effects of the trauma registry can be the focus of attention of policy-making bodies.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
Trauma, Registry, Policy-making, Research priority setting
نویسندگان مقاله
Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh |
National Institute for Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Farzan Berenjian |
Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Efat Mohammadi |
Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Farhad Habibi |
Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Alireza Olyaeemanesh |
National Institute for Health Research and Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Kazem Zendedel |
Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini |
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
نشانی اینترنتی
https://beat.sums.ac.ir/article_47745_26fe03d3c35d2a12e5c06a651c923b96.pdf
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات