این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
چهارشنبه 26 آذر 1404
Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
، جلد ۸، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۲۳-۱۲۸
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Positioning Patients with Hip Fractures for Spinal Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study between The Two Blocks
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Background: Hip fractures are a common and disabling injury caused by osteoporosis of the joints, and they have a significant socioeconomic impact. Any movement at the hip joint, whether during the transfer to the hospital or during a radiological procedure followed by OT, causes excruciating pain. Multiple comorbidities increase the need for regional analgesia and anaesthesia in elderly people. The primary purpose was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided supra inguinal FICB to that of PENG block for positioning during spinal anaesthesia. Comfort of anaesthetist while giving spinal anaesthesia and patient’s acceptance score were secondary objectives. Methods: The 60 patients in this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled research were scheduled to undergo elective surgery for hip fractures under spinal anaesthesia. They were allotted in two groups- group FICB(n=30) and group PENG(n=30). Ultrasound guided Supra inguinal FICB was performed in FICB group and PENG block was performed in the PENG group with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in each group. Evaluation of pain before intervention, just before positioning and while positioning patients for spinal anaesthesia was done using NRS score. Comfort of the anaesthetist while positioning for spinal anaesthesia and patient acceptance was also assessed. Results: The NRS score did not differ significantly between the two groups (p= 0.853). On a scale of 0 to 3, the anaesthetist's comfort delivering spinal anaesthesia did not differ significantly between the two groups (p= 0.553). There was no statistically significant link between anaesthesia acceptance and group preference (p= 0.504) Conclusion: The newly invented PENG block to facilitate sitting positioning in fracture hip joint patients for spinal anaesthesia was equally effective to supra inguinal FICB.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
| Priyanka Kulkarni
Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, India.
| Poonam Ghodki
Department of Anaesthesiology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, India.
| Aakruti Prabhu
Department of Anaesthesiology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, India.
نشانی اینترنتی
https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/427
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات