این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
شنبه 22 آذر 1404
Dental Research Journal
، جلد ۲۰، شماره ۱، صفحات ۰-۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Comparison of the outcomes and complications of three‑unit porcelain‑fused‑to‑metal tooth‑implant‑supported prostheses with implant‑supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta‑analysis
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Background: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications of three‑unit porcelain‑fused‑to‑metal tooth‑implant‑supported prostheses in comparison with implant‑supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: In this review article, the electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, EBSCO, LIVIVO, and Embase were searched over the past 20 years until December 2021. Risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI), fixed effect model, and Mantel–Haenszel method was calculated. The meta‑analysis was performed with the statistical software Stata/MP v. 16. Results: Two hundred and three studies were selected for reviewing the abstracts, from which the full texts of 16 studies were reviewed. Finally, five studies were selected. The risk ratio of prosthesis failure between the tooth‑implant‑supported prosthesis and the implant‑supported prosthesis was RR (Risk Ratio)= 1.83 (0.79, 4.24), (P = 0.16) and for prosthesis complication, it was RR = 0.61 (0.35, 1.06), (P = 0.08). Risk ratio of implant failure between the mentioned groups was RR = 2.33 (0.84, 6.41), (P = 0.10), and for implant complications, this rate was 0.09 (RR, 0.09 95% CI − 1.30, 1.48; P = 0.90). Conclusion: The meta‑analysis of the present study showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (three‑unit porcelain‑fused‑to‑metal tooth‑implant‑supported prosthesis and implant‑supported prosthesis reconstruction) in terms of the total failure of implants and prostheses and the complication rate of implants and prostheses. Key Words: Dental Prosthesis, meta‑analysis, systematic review
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
| Amirhossein Fathi
| Ramin Atash
| Elmira Fardi
| Mahsa Nili Ahmadabadi
| Sara Hashemi
نشانی اینترنتی
http://drj.mui.ac.ir/index.php/drj/article/view/2406
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
Systematic Review Article
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات