این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Evidence Based Care، جلد ۱۲، شماره ۲، صفحات ۴۱-۵۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Comparison of Sprotte and Quincke Spinal Needles on the Frequency of Spinal Anesthesia Failure in Patients undergoing Cesarean Delivery
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Introduction: The aim of the present study was to compare Sprotte and Quincke spinal needles on the frequency of spinal anesthesia failure in patients undergoing cesarean delivery.Materials and Methods: In this randomized and double-blind clinical trial, 100 pregnant women in ASA class I or II, term and single pregnancies who were candidates for elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were studied. In patients of the study group (n=50), spinal anesthesia was performed using Sprotte spinal needle 25G and in patients of the control group (n=50) with Quincke's spinal needle 25G. The frequency of spinal anesthesia failure was recorded as complete and partial failure.Results: In the study group, one patient of incomplete failure two patients with complete failure; and in the control group, 2 patients of incomplete failure and 3 patients of complete failure were observed, which was not a statistically significant difference between the two study groups (p=0.749). Only 3 patients of the control group require repeat spinal block. The frequency of sensory (p=0.002) and motor (p=0.001) block for surgery was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. The Post-Dural puncture headache (PDPH) was significantly higher in the control group (14% vs. 0%; p=0.006).Conclusion: The frequency of spinal anesthesia failure and post-Dural puncture headache (PDPH) using Sprotte spinal needle was lower than in Quincke needle in patients with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Cesarean delivery, Spinal anesthesia, Failure, Sprotte, Quincke
نویسندگان مقاله | Simin Atashkhoei
Department of anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran


| Eissa Bilehjani
Department of anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran


| Fariba Nassiri Milani
Department of Anesthesiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran


| Sajjad Pourasghary
Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran


| Solmaz Fakhari
Department of anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
نشانی اینترنتی https://ebcj.mums.ac.ir/article_20247.html
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده مقاله پژوهشی اصیل کمی و کیفی
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات