این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma، جلد ۱۰، شماره ۳، صفحات ۱۲۲-۱۲۷
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Comparison the Ability of Quantitative Trauma Severity Assessment Methods Based On GAP, RTS, and ISS Criteria in Determining the Prognosis of Accidental Patients
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Objective: To compare the ability of quantitative trauma severity assessment methods based on Glasgow comascale, age, and arterial pressure (GAP), revised trauma score (RTS), and injury severity score (ISS) criteria indetermining the prognosis of accidental patients.Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on random patients referred to Imam Khomeini Hospitalin Urmia from March 20, 2020 to September 21, 2020. The data were obtained by using a checklist includesitems such as age, sex, respiration rate, oxygen saturation level, pulse rate, primary blood pressure, initialGlascow coma scale (GCS), patient outcome and injury to different parts of body. After collecting the data, itwas entered into SPSS 18 and analyzed with the descriptive and analytical statistics include an independentt-test and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves.Results: Out of 1930 studied patients, 365 (18.9%) were women and 1565 (81.1%) were men. The mean age ofpatients was 37.05±17.11 years and women were significantly older than men. The mortality rate was 4.8% andwas significantly more in men compared to women. The mean blood pressure, GCS and oxygen saturation levelwere lower in deceased patients. The mean GAP, ISS and RTS values were 23.13±2.69, 4.07±3.82, 7.72±0.52,respectively. The mean values of GAP and RTS were significantly low in deceased patients whereas the meanISS value was significantly high in the deceased patients. The Area under the curve (AUS) for ISS was greaterthan the other two scoring systems.Conclusion: The findings of the current study showed that all three systems were adequately efficient toprognoses the final outcome in multi-trauma patients but the ISS measure was better than the other two criteria.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Mortality, Injury, emergency, Accidents
نویسندگان مقاله Behrang Khafafi |
Department of Emergency Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Omid Garkaz |
School of Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Saeed Golfiroozi |
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Sahar Paryab |
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Laia Ashouri |
General Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Sevda Daei |
General Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Hamid Reza Mehryar |
Department of Emergency Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Mousa Ghelichi-Ghojogh |
Department of Epidemiology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

نشانی اینترنتی https://beat.sums.ac.ir/article_48584_dcc270871cc6d137ef857ce203d4d236.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات