این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Applied Research on English Language، جلد ۱۱، شماره ۳، صفحات ۷۹-۹۴
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Analysis of the Language Used in the Reports of Peer-Review Journals
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله : Peer review plays a vital and major role to determine the fate of manuscripts submitted to international academic journals. The present study analyzed the discourse structure and the language use of a corpus containing 43 peer review reports from journals from three disciplines (i.e., Applied Linguistics, Accounting, and Sociology). This study analyzed the most frequent discourse moves, negative, and positive expressions used in minor revisions, major revisions, and rejected manuscripts. The findings of this study showed that all discourse moves appeared in all peer review reports but two moves “Summarizing Judgment” and “Conclusion and Recommendation” were the most frequent discourse moves in all peer-review categories. The findings also revealed that the words “well”, “good”, and “original” were the most frequently-used positive words, while the words “unclear”, “inconsistent”, and “poor” were the most frequently-used negative words in the analyzed peer-review reports. The study recommends some points to be considered in future research on this topic.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Discourse structure, discourse moves, peer-reviews, academic journals, Genre
نویسندگان مقاله Fadi Al-Khasawneh |
Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Faculty of Languages and Translation, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

نشانی اینترنتی https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_26625_768b0219a69d37e488afc463301274b9.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات