| چکیده فارسی مقاله |
Bolisani E, Bratianu C. The emergence of knowledge management. InEmergent knowledge strategies 2018 (pp. 23-47). Springer, Cham.Namdarian L, Naimi-Sadigh A. Towards an understanding of the commercialization drivers of research findings in Iran. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2018 Jul 1;10 (4): 389-99.Perkmann M, Walsh K. The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2009 Dec 1;18 (6): 1033-65.Abreu, M., Grinevich, V. Hughes, A., Kitson, M. Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, Centre for Business Research and UK∼IRC, University of Cambridge. 2009.عباسی اسفنجانی، حسین. طراحی الگوی تجاریسازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی با روش مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری حداقل مربعات جزئی. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی. 1-21. 21 (82)، 1396.علی احمدی، علیرضا، فروزنده، لطفا...، عباسی اسفنجانی، حسین. شناسایی ابزارهای حمایتی دولتها برای تجاریسازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی. رهیافت، 47 (20). 1389.Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38 (6), 936-946.ندیرخانلو، سمیرا. تجاریسازی علم در ایران: ملاحظات انتقادی. رهیافت، 26 (64). 1395.Rasmussen E, Moen Ø, Gulbrandsen M. Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation. 2006 Apr 1; 26 (4): 518-33.Etzkowitz H. Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy. 2003 Jan 1; 32 (1): 109-21.Slaughter S, Leslie LL. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1997Henrekson M, Rosenberg N. Incentives for academic entrepreneurship and economic performance: Sweden and the United States. IUI Working Paper; 2000.Debackere K, Veugelers R. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research policy. 2005 Apr 1; 34 (3): 321-42.Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research policy. 2004 May 1; 33 (4): 643-59.Siegel DS, Veugelers R, Wright M. Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy. 2007 Dec 1; 23 (4): 640-60.McDougall G, Roberts A. Commercializing Air Traffic Control: have the reforms worked? Canadian Public Administration. 2008 Mar; 51 (1): 45-69.Gans J, Stern S. Managing ideas: Commercialization strategies for biotechnology. Melbourne: Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne; 2002 Feb.Greis NP. Technology adoption, product design, and process change: a case study in the machine tool industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1995 Aug; 42 (3): 192-202.Katila R, Mang PY. Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research policy. 2003 Feb 1; 32 (2): 317-32.Shan W, Visudtibhan K. Cooperative strategy in commercializing an emerging technology. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990 Jul 25; 47 (2): 172-81.Pisano, G., Shan, W., Teece, D., 1988. Joint ventures and collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In: Mowery, D. (Ed.), International Collaborative Ventures in US Manufacturing. Ballinger Press, Cambridge, MA.Liebeskind JP, Argyres NS. Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology. Available at SSRN 10041. 1996.Monteverde K, Teece DJ. Vertical integration and supplier switching costs. Bell Journal of Economics. 1982; 13 (1): 206-13.Das TK, Teng BS. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management. 2000 Jan 1; 26 (1): 31-61.Osborn RN, Baughn CC. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Academy of Management journal. 1990 Sep 1; 33 (3): 503-19.Dutta S, Narasimhan O, Rajiv S. Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?. Marketing science. 1999 Nov; 18 (4): 547-68.Oxley JE. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 1997 Oct 1; 13 (2): 387-409.عسگری، امیر، خورسندی طاسکوه، علی، غیاثیندوشن، سعید، قاضینوری، سیّد سروش و محمّدصادق خیاطیانیزدی. «بیان ماهیت و ارائه مدل استقرار ناحیه نوآوری: پژوهشی فراترکیب با استفاده از متنکاوی»، شماره 81، 20 صص 21-41. 1400.Khan MS. Q & A. Are Universities Ready for Knowledge Commercialization?. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2017; 7 (7).Alipour, AR & Enayati T, Fourth Generation Universities Research Commercialization. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 2017; 26 (26): 53-76.Coffman WR, Lesser WH, McCouch SR. Commercialization and the scientific research process: The example of plant breeding. Science and the University. 2003 May 20.Lowe J. Commercialization of university research: a policy perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1993 Jan 1; 5 (1): 27-37. |
| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Commercialization of research has been widely spread in recent decades as a new approach in academic research. Commercialization of university researches is the most important responsibility of universities in linking universities with industry and sustainable development. One of the main reasons for comprehensive development in developed countries is the attention to the commercialization of research and innovative ideas in the field of technology. The purpose of this research is to design a model of academic research commercialization based on previous studies, considering the important role of academic research commercialization in the development of the industry and economy of each society.. The present article tries to systematically review the findings of studies in this regard using the meta-combined method. In this study, the seven-step model, Barroso and Sandlowski (2007) is used and based on the formation process and output achievement, to analyze They pay. For this purpose, by referring to the valid documents available on the electronic sites, 57 articles were reviewed and finally 23 articles were approved and the categories extracted in the form of a model with four components: Research, development and market entry, functions and decisions were identified. The validity of the analysis was assessed using the kappa coefficient, which was equal to 0.78. The results showed that since the models studied in the research sources section, almost all of them have been presented by the authors for commercialization in the private sector as well as product development, The main pattern of commercialization is divided into four parts: research, functions, decisions, and development and market entry. |