این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
جمعه 28 آذر 1404
پژوهش های فلسفی – کلامی
، جلد ۲۲، شماره ۳، صفحات ۵-۱۳
عنوان فارسی
God, Love, and Interreligious Dialogue
چکیده فارسی مقاله
The monotheistic religions that valorize love typically believe that their love for God should be extended to God's creatures and, in particular, to one's fellow human beings. Yet, in practice, the love of the Christian or Muslim or Hindu monotheist doesn't always extend to the love of the religious other. Precisely how, then, should the adherents of the major monotheistic religions respond to the obvious diversity of these religions? The arguments of philosophical theology largely depend on what John Henry Newman called our "illative sense" or faculty of informal reasoning. Even the most fully developed illative sense can vary from one person to another, however. As a consequence, Christian, Muslim, and Hindu monotheists are unlikely to fully agree on matters of philosophical theology. I argue that this precludes neither mutual respect, though, nor a rational adherence to the philosophical and theological views of one's own tradition.
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
God, Love, and Interreligious Dialogue
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
The monotheistic religions that valorize love typically believe that their love for God should be extended to God's creatures and, in particular, to one's fellow human beings. Yet, in practice, the love of the Christian or Muslim or Hindu monotheist doesn't always extend to the love of the religious other. Precisely how, then, should the adherents of the major monotheistic religions respond to the obvious diversity of these religions? The arguments of philosophical theology largely depend on what John Henry Newman called our "illative sense" or faculty of informal reasoning. Even the most fully developed illative sense can vary from one person to another, however. As a consequence, Christian, Muslim, and Hindu monotheists are unlikely to fully agree on matters of philosophical theology. I argue that this precludes neither mutual respect, though, nor a rational adherence to the philosophical and theological views of one's own tradition.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
Love of God. Neighbor Love. Illative Sense. Dialogue
نویسندگان مقاله
William J Wainwright |
distinguished professor emeritus of philosophy, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
نشانی اینترنتی
https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1714_d38e07cabe0b598a2caf4d638162a560.pdf
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات