این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
یکشنبه 23 آذر 1404
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
، جلد ۱۱، شماره ۶، صفحات ۴۲۱-۴۲۹
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Closing-wedge and Opening-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy as Successful Treatments of Symptomatic Medial Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Objectives: Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) are commonly used osteotomy techniques for the symptomatic knee osteoarthritis treatment. However, there is no consensus on which method provides superior outcomes. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes, radiologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of these techniques. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 76 patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and associated varus malalignment were randomized into the CWHTO and OWHTO groups (n=38). The primary outcome measures were knee function evaluated by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and knee pain assessed by a visual analog scale. The secondary outcome measures were posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial bone varus angle, and postoperative complications. Results: Both techniques significantly improved the clinical and radiologic outcome measures. The mean improvement of total KOOS was not significantly different between the CWHTO and OPHTO groups (P=0.55). Moreover, the improvement in various KOOS subscales was not significantly different between the two groups. The mean improvement of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was not significantly different between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups (P=0.89). The mean PTS change was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.34). The mean improvement of the varus angle was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.28). The rate of postoperative complications was not remarkably different between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups. Conclusion: Considering no observed superiority of each osteotomy technique over the other one, two techniques could be used interchangeably and based on the surgeon's preference. Level of evidence: I
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
Closing-wedge, High tibial osteotomy, opening-wedge, Osteoarthritis
نویسندگان مقاله
| Mohammadreza Safdari
1 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
| Ali Dastjerdi
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| Nahid Makhmalbaf
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| Mahshid Makhmalbaf
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| Hadi Makhmalbaf
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
نشانی اینترنتی
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_22282.html
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
RESEARCH PAPER
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات