این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Dental Research Journal، جلد ۲۰، شماره ۱۱، صفحات ۰-۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Comparison of marginal leakage and retentive strength of implant‑supported milled zirconia and cobalt‑chromium copings cemented with different temporary cements
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Background: Few studies assessed the effect of coping material (particularly milled metal copings) on the retentive strength of cements and reported contradictory results. Thus, this study aims to assess the marginal leakage and retentive strength of implant‑supported milled zirconia and cobalt‑chromium (Co‑Cr) copings cemented with different temporary cements. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, Zirconia and Co‑Cr copings were fabricated on 100 straight titanium abutments. Each group of copings was divided into five subgroups (n = 10) for the use of different cements: permanent zinc‑phosphate (ZP) cement, temporary zinc oxide eugenol cement (temp bond [TB]), calcium hydroxide‑based temporary cement (Dycal [DC]), polymer‑based eugenol‑free acrylic‑urethane temporary cement (Dentotemp [DT]), and methacrylate‑based temporary cement (Implantlink [IL]). The retentive strength and marginal leakage of restorations were assessed. Data were analyzed by one‑way ANOVA, Tukey, and Fisher’s exact tests ( = 0.05). Results: In the Co‑Cr group, the retentive strength values (in Newtons) were as follows: ZP (411.40 ± 5.19) >DC (248.80 ± 5.01) >IL (200.10 ± 5.06) >DT (157.90 ± 5.19) >TB (98.50 ± 6.88). This order was as follows in the zirconia group: ZP (388.70 ± 5.35) >DC (226.60 ± 5.08) >IL (179.00 ± 3.71) >DT (136.00 ± 4.88) >TB (78.60 ± 3.50). All pairwise comparisons were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The difference in marginal leakage was not significant among the groups (P = 0.480). Conclusion: The type of coping material and cement type significantly affected retentive strength, but not marginal leakage, of implant restorations. Milled Co‑Cr copings showed higher retentive strength than zirconia copings, and ZP cement followed by DC yielded the highest retention. Key Words: Computer‑aided design, dental cements, dental prosthesis, implant‑supported     Highlight Hamid Neshandar Asli :  Pubmed , Google Scholar  
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله | Amirreza Hendi


| Mehran Falahchai


| Saeid Hasanpour Sigaroodi


| Hamid Neshandar Asli


نشانی اینترنتی http://drj.mui.ac.ir/index.php/drj/article/view/2534
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده Original Article(s)
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات