این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery، جلد ۱۲، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۲-۱۸
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Is Arthroscopic Latarjet a Cost-Effective Procedure? A Decision Analysis
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Objectives: Arthroscopic Latarjet for glenohumeral stabilization has emerged as an alternative to the open approach; however, the evidence to date has questioned if this technique delivers improved outcomes. This analysis provides an assessment of the cost and utility associated with arthroscopic versus open Latarjet.Methods: The cost-effectiveness of Latarjet stabilization was modeled over a ten-year period. Institutional cases were reviewed for equipment utilization. Cost data from ambulatory surgical centers was obtained for each piece of equipment used intraoperatively. Based upon prior analyses, the operating room cost was assigned a value of $36.14 per minute. To determine effectiveness, a utility score was derived based upon prior analysis of shoulder stabilization using the EuroQol (EQ) 5D. For reoperations, a utility score of 0.01 was assigned for a single year for revision surgeries for instability and 0.5 for minor procedures. Probability of surgical outcomes and operative time for arthroscopic and open Latarjet were taken from prior studies comparing outcomes of these procedures. Decisiontree analysis utilizing these values was performed.Results: Based upon equipment and operating room costs, arthroscopic Latarjet was found to cost $2,796.87 more than the equivalent open procedure. Analysis of the utility of these procedures were 1.330 and 1.338 quality adjusted life years obtained over the modeled period for arthroscopic versus open Latarjet, respectively. For arthroscopic Latarjet to be cost-equivalent to open Latarjet, surgical time would need to be reduced to 41.5 minutes or the surgical equipment would need to be provided at no expense, while maintaining the same success rates.Conclusion: With nearly identical utility scores favoring open surgery, the added cost associated with arthroscopic Latarjet cannot be supported with available cost and utility data. To provide value, additional benefits such as decreased post-operative narcotic utilization, decreased blood loss, or lower complications of the arthroscopic approach must be demonstrated. Level of evidence: IV
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Arthroscopic Latarjet, Cost Analysis, Latarjet procedure, shoulder instability
نویسندگان مقاله | Ryan Lopez
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Benjamin Zmistowski
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Benjamin Hendy
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Cassandra Sanko
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Alexis Williams
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Charles Getz
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Joseph Abboud
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


| Surena Namdari
The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
نشانی اینترنتی https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_23455.html
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده RESEARCH PAPER
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات