این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
ژئوپلیتیک، جلد ۱۹، شماره ۷۲، صفحات ۲۲۹-۲۴۵
عنوان فارسی Trump’s Winning Strategy in the ۲۰۱۶ US Presidential Election: In New-Institutionalism Analysis
چکیده فارسی مقاله Trump’s nationalist-populist narrative is certainly appealing when discussed in a new-institutionalism tradition perspective sociologically in particular. The value, in this case, refers to the right wing leaning on the borderline of white supremacy who wish to be brought back by Trump through his remarkable slogan: “Make America Great Again”. The article is based on the perspective of new-institutionalism tradition. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Trump’s winning strategy as a political actor in the political institution, how it is based on values that are socially constructed or culturally framed. During the work, the perspective of new-institutionalism tradition, qualitative approach and secondary data were used. The authors adopt a qualitative approach and use secondary data. The conclusions were made about Trump’s various controversial strategies in the US Presidential Election 2016 that were caused by the populist narratives he adopted in the campaign. The results obtained can be useful for political scientists, GR-managers, PR-managers in the field of politics, political technologists, and other related specialists.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Trump’s Winning Strategy in the 2016 US Presidential Election: In New-Institutionalism Analysis
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Trump’s nationalist-populist narrative is certainly appealing when discussed in a new-institutionalism tradition perspective sociologically in particular. The value, in this case, refers to the right wing leaning on the borderline of white supremacy who wish to be brought back by Trump through his remarkable slogan: “Make America Great Again”. The article is based on the perspective of new-institutionalism tradition. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Trump’s winning strategy as a political actor in the political institution, how it is based on values that are socially constructed or culturally framed. During the work, the perspective of new-institutionalism tradition, qualitative approach and secondary data were used. The authors adopt a qualitative approach and use secondary data. The conclusions were made about Trump’s various controversial strategies in the US Presidential Election 2016 that were caused by the populist narratives he adopted in the campaign. The results obtained can be useful for political scientists, GR-managers, PR-managers in the field of politics, political technologists, and other related specialists.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله nationalism, Populism, new-institutionalism, Immigrants, the electoral college
نویسندگان مقاله Yusa Djuyandi |
Full Doctor in Political Sciences, Department of Political Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.

Jihan Auliana Ghaisani |
Student, Department of Political Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.

Michael Sebastian Alisuci |
Master in Political Sciences, Department of International Relations, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

نشانی اینترنتی https://journal.iag.ir/article_154917_b18bd9f56ceebb31b197ba9577b4a9cf.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات