این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
سه شنبه 18 آذر 1404
Acta Medica Iranica
، جلد ۴۹، شماره ۶، صفحات ۳۵۲-۳۵۶
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy; Which Method to Choose? A Prospective Randomized Comparison
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency with the incidence rate of 6-10%. Although several studies have compared the two approaches of open (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) the technique of choice is still a matter of controversy. Considering this background we designed a study to compare OA and LA outcomes in our center. One hundred patients were included in this study performed from April 2008 to April 2009 at Shahid Sadoughi hospital, Yazd, Iran. Patients who gave informed consent were randomized to either OA or LA groups and were operated by McBurney's or laparoscopic technique, respectively. Patients received our center's routine diet, antibiotics and analgesic regimens. The patients' pain was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) at their entrance to the recovery room and in 6-hour intervals up to 24 hours. Post-operation follow up visits were in weeks 1, 2 and 4. The data of operation time, hospital stay, intra-operation complications, time to resume normal activity, short term complications and neuralgia were collected and analysed. The average operation time was 34.48.42 min in LA and 41.78.84 in OA hand (P=0001). No intra-operative complication and no LA to OA conversion were encountered in operations. Post-operative complication rate was higher in OA group (n=10) compared to LA (n=3). The post-operative pain showed less pain in OA only at 6 and 12 hours post-operative times. Patients' mean hospital stay was 52.3219.2 and 42.9613.8 hours in LA and OA groups, respectively (P=0.003). Time to resume normal activity didn't show a significant difference between two groups (P=0.53). Only one case of neuralgia in the OA group was confronted in the follow up visits. LA has less complications and cosmetic scar with the cost of more pain. Decision between OA and LA for each patient should be made individually.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
Appendectomy,Laparoscopic,open
نویسندگان مقاله
سعید کارگر | saeed kargar
department of surgery, general surgeon, shahid sadoughi hospital, shahid sadoughi university of medical sciences, yazd, iran.
محمد حسین میرشمسی | mohammad hussein mirshamsi
department of surgery, general surgeon, shahid sadoughi hospital, shahid sadoughi university of medical sciences, yazd, iran.
محمد زارع | mohammad zare
department of surgery, general surgeon, shahid sadoughi hospital, shahid sadoughi university of medical sciences, yazd, iran.
سعید عارفانیان | saeed arefanian
department of surgery, general surgeon, shahid sadoughi hospital, shahid sadoughi university of medical sciences, yazd, iran.
الهام شادمان یزدی | elham shadman yazdi
department of surgery, general surgeon, shahid sadoughi hospital, shahid sadoughi university of medical sciences, yazd, iran.
asiah عارف | asiah aref
department of surgery, general surgeon, shahid sadoughi hospital, shahid sadoughi university of medical sciences, yazd, iran.
نشانی اینترنتی
http://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3755
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
Articles
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات