این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
سیاست، جلد ۴۶، شماره ۴، صفحات ۸۳۹-۸۵۹
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی A comparative study of the influence of continental and analytical philosophy on the religious innovators in the Islamic Republic of Iran (with emphasis on Reza Davari Ardakani and Abdolkarim Soroush).
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله The two discourses with a focus on Reza Davari Ardekani and Abdolkarim Soroush, were formed in Iran’s society. Soroush’s discourse , with religious interests influenced by Islamic sources, Poper’s philosophy of science, logic and epistemoloical accuracies of analytical philosophy and consciously liberalism, is following compatibility with modernity.The second discourse on Ahmad Reza Davari Ardakani thought and its intellectual ancestry ,i.e., Ahmad Fardid in combination with the religious , identical, Heideggerian and Continental interests began to deal with anti-modern interpretations such as, the defence of philosophy in opposition to the oriented logic and scientism, the use of anti-Enlightenment Western assumptions about society, politics, religion, science, and the religious stance against subjectivity or the rationality of modern man as well.The discourses, each in turn, had a significant impact on forming political and social attitudes, both religious and non-religious,and so sought to respond to the problems raised in Iran’s community.Discussions of both‌ discourses(some consider them philosophical and the others ideological) ,which have their roots in pre-Islamic Revolution, began with disputed from the beginning of Revolution and cosistently the differences were reached their peak .But in recent times, the discussions of the two thinkers came closer together ,and partly achieved to some common standpoints.The aim of present paper,therefore, is to study the thoughts of Reza Davari Ardekani and Abdolkarim Soroush , influenced by Continental and Analytic philosophy, in Comparative research method. It is explained how Soroush, consciously, with his religious interests, sought to do compatibility with modernity; but unlike such approach, the stance of Davari Ardekani, along with his own religious interests, was against subjectivity or modern rationality.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله عارف برخورداری |
استادیار گروه اندیشۀ سیاسی مرکز مطالعات عالی انقلاب اسلامی دانشگاه تهران
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه تهران (Tehran university)

نشانی اینترنتی http://jpq.ut.ac.ir/article_59929_4ad6475d07ad991c50c6f2d633665ee9.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/916/article-916-314170.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات