| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
 Mapping Landslide Hazard Zonation in Great Karoon Aquifer Basin by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model in Geographic Information System (GIS) Environment    M. Yamani, S. Hasanpoor, A. Mostafaei, M. Shadman Roodposhti  Received: October 19, 2010/ Accepted: August 13, 2011, 13-16 P     Extended abstract  1- Introduction  We have done this research in order to study frequency and transmissivity on big and widespread landslides in Great Karoon aquifer basin due to establish Great Karoon no 1,2,3 dams Purpose of this research is mapping landslide hazard zonation in Conformity with the new area activities and changes after: 1. Dams establishment, 2. land cover changing due to irrigation, drainage, river branches and irrigation canals. 3. Topography change of the zone due to harvest, moving huge amounts of soil and excavation process .    In this research after considering previous researches and library studies we have found out 8 effective factors as essential items in occurring landslides: slope, altitude, rainfall, and distance from road, distance from fault, and distance from drainage basin, land cover and petrology . Then we made information layers of these factors by using Arc GIS9.3 softwares in GIS environment .after it we allocated classes' weight of every factor by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method .  We made ultimate map by compounding the different layers, and then categorized it in 4 classes extremely hazardous, fully hazardous, middle hazardous and less hazardous. The extremely hazardous zones are affected by area geology conditions and it's known as main factor in the landslide transmissivity, and other effective items are: the slope between 5% to 30% , the drainage more than 1250 mm, the height between 500 to 2000 m and the distance from drainage basin between 0 to 4 km . Most of the extremely hazardous zones are pastures and plains that villagers and immigrant tribes use them and their water for grazing live stocks and especially for water cultivation in the slope zones . Eventually we came to this conclusion that AHP method is more accurate and better than other methods because it contains more variables and principled classifications without any experts' direct ideas.  Landslides are vitally important and we know them as worldwide disasters, owing to cause gigantic compensations. Final goal of every mass process is mapping zonation and categorizing hazardous zones in to different scales for reducing any possible damage . Nowadays there are many different ways for earth mass processing movement . In regards to establishment of Great Karoon no1, 2, 3 dams, the frequency and transmissivity on big and widespread landslides in aquifer basin of Great Karoon are 219 times during 20 months (according to reports of Geology Organization 387, 68)  Purpose of carrying out this research is mapping landslide hazard zonation in conformity with produced changes after:1. Dams establishment 2 land cover changing due to irrigation, drainage ,river branches and irrigation canals.3.Topography change of the zone due to harvest and moving huge amounts of soil .In this research we have applied the AHP method i.e. a method in according to expertise judgment.  Framework of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was based on pair comparison. Generally in this method at first we use oral judgments (experts' opinion) for assigning different parameters and changing them to quantitative scales . We made a matrix for parameters and scored them (Ï), and then we multiplied every score to every classâs weighting coefficient and they added to each other, finally this model was obtained : M is sensitivity parameter).  We made ultimate map by compounding the different layers, and then categorized it in 4 classes extremely hazardous, fully hazardous, middle hazardous and less hazardous .  Land cover of the extremely hazardous and fully hazardous zones is often pastures and jungles. the road factor has obtained more weight and in happening landslides it's more effective when the roads are placed in high slope and high altitude (height) . As final conclusion we can say that in comparison with other methods the AHP method is superior and more accurate, due to having more variables and principled classifications without involving the experts ' directs ideas (by using the obtained weights of pair comparison parameters in standard matrix.  Key Words: zonation, landslide, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method Geographic Information System (GIS), Great Karoon aquifer basin   References  Ahmadi, H., (1998), Applied Geomorphology, Volume 2: Wilderness, wind erosion, Tehran University Press  Ahmadi, H., Ismail Vry, OR. Faiz M., SA. Law Jafari, M.. (2003) classification using mass Khtrhrkathay  Alaei Taleghani, M., (2002). Geomorphology Iran Nshrqvms numbers 1950 and 1958, first edition, 375 pp.  Anbalagan, R, 1992: Land slid hazard development and zonation Geoloey, vol 32, pp. 269_277  Asgharpour, M.-C. (2004), a multi-criteria decision making (AHP), Third edition, Tehran University Press  Aounagh, M., (2003), Modeling Vphnh Nrmab classified landslide in the basin, MS Thesis, Tehran University, pp. 29.  Cream, Amir Faraj Mahmoud R., (2005), Quantitative modeling of the Zagros Folded Vphnh Landslide Classification (Bryzsrkhvn basin in Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari Province) Geographical Studies, No. 51, 14-1.  Department of Agriculture, (2003), vegetation coverage maps of land use plans and programs of Khuzestan and Northern Affairs, General Directorate of Statistics and information  Geological Survey of Iran, Geological map of the study area of 250,000 1 100,000 1 50,000 1  Ghodsi M, SH. (2002). AHP ((AHP Amir Kabir University Press  Grateful, E., (1995): Landslide hazard zonation and its relation to sediment production in Taleghan, master's thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, 2004.  Iranian Space Agency in 2009, Landsat ETM Landsat satellite images of the study area.  Jafari, M., (1994), Analytical study Vnvyn largest landslides in the earthquake zone in June 1369 Layers of Gilan, bachelor thesis Arshdzmyn of Engineering, Tarbiat Modarres University. Pp. 51  Jalali, N., (2002): An evaluation of methods for landslide hazard zonation in the Basin Taleqan final report of the research project, Institute of Soil Conservation Vabkhyzdary.  Khan, SH, (2001), using the mass Khtrhrkat regional model quality characteristics, Hasystmha AHP AHP system, Bkhyztalqan Basin Case Study, Master Thesis, School of Natural Resources Watershed. Tehran University.  Orientation, (2006). Studied mass movements in order to provide zoning MODELS Khtrdrhvz·h Lajym Tajan river. Danshk·h MA thesis, University of Natural Resources, 25 p.  Sacred song, N., (1993), Landslide hazard zonation in earthquake-prone areas (case study of landslides triggered by an earthquake in June 1990 Mjyl.) Master of Science Thesis, University  Salehi, A., (2001), Hydro Mfyk parameters influencing the range of motion teapot catchment using GIS, MS Thesis, Tehran University, P 4.  Statistical Center of Iran (2007), (1998), Statistical Yearbook province  Technique of multiple regression (MR), Analytic Hierarchy Process Systems (AHP) Abryzgrmy tea Basin case study. Mjah of natural resources. Volume 56. No. 4. Pp. 323-335.  Theoretically, h, Health, l, (2003), Report on geological province 100000 Scale: 1 Geological Survey.  Van uestern, C.j .and R. soeters, 1997 ,GISSI Z: Geographig information system in slope instability Zonation , ITC Nether lands, 15 pp.  Varnes, David j. UNESCO, 1987, Landslides hazard Zonation: a review of principles and practice, printed in France  |