این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، جلد ۲۳، شماره ۲، صفحات ۵۳-۶۸

عنوان فارسی تحلیل تطبیقی سطح و میزان توسعه یافتگی اجتماعی شهرستان‌های استان هرمزگان
چکیده فارسی مقاله هدف اصلی برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای در کشورهای مختلف تحقق توسعه و کاهش نابرابریهای منطقه‌ای و نیل به توسعه پایدار است. گام نخست درحل مسائل ناشی ازعدم تعادل‌های منطقه‌ای شناخت وسطح بندی مناطق از نظربرخورداری در زمینه‌های گوناگون اقتصادی، زیربنایی، ارتباطات، اجتماعی، فرهنگی، بهداشتی، درمانی، آموزشی، وغیره است. لازمه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، شناسایی جایگاه مناطق نسبت به یکدیگر به لحاظ توسعه است. این تحقیق تلاش دارد با بهره گیری از روش‌های اسنادی، تحلیلی و علی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی، با بکاربردن 38 شاخص آموزشی، بهداشتی و درمانی، فرهنگی، زیر بنایی و ارتباطی شهرستان‌های استان هرمزگان را از لحاظ میزان توسعه یافتگی رتبه بندی نماید. در این مقاله ابتدا ضمن تشریح تکنیک تحلیل عاملی و با استفاده از نرم افزار spss. 16 شاخص‌های مورد مطالعه به 5 عامل تقلیل یافته و به صورت ترکیبی در عوامل معنی دار ارائه گردیده است. سپس بر اساس نتایج حاصله (امتیازات عاملی) با بکار گیری روش تحلیل خوشه‌ای، سطح بندی شهرستان‌های استان هرمزگان در گروه‌های همگن و مشابه به لحاظ میزان توسعه یافتگی هر یک از آن‌ها صورت پذیرفته است. نتایج حاصله از این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که پراکنش سطوح توسعه نامتعادل بوده وبین شهرستان‌های استان هرمزگان ازنظرتوسعه یافتگی ناهماهنگی دیده می‌شود و این تفاوت وپراکندگی دربخشهای مختلف آموزشی، بهداشت و درمان، فرهنگی، ارتباطات و رفاهی وزیربنایی وجود دارد. به طوری که شهرستان‌های ابوموسی، پارسیان، بندرعباس توسعه یافته و شهرستان‌های بستک، لنگه، حاجی آباد در حال توسعه و شهرستان‌های خمیر، رودان، قشم کمترتوسعه یافته و شهرستانهای جاسک و میناب در سطح محروم هستند. راهکارهای این تحقیق می‌تواند در بهینه سازی وضع موجود و ساماندهی سطوح توسعه در این استان مؤثر باشد.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله

عنوان انگلیسی Determining and Analysis the Development levels and Degree of Townships in Hormozgan Province
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله  Determining and Analysis the Development levels and Degree of Townships in Hormozgan Province    M. Taghvaei. M. Saboory  Received: May 18, 2010 / Accepted: April 16, 2011, 17-20 P      Extended Abstract  1- Introduction :  The main goal of regional planning in different countries is reaching to develop and decrease regional imbalance and achieving to sustainable development. First pace to solve the problem of regional imbalances is knows the ranking of regions in case of development in various fields such as economic, fundamental communication, social, cultural, medical and education and so on. Knowing the levels of townships development of Hormozgan Province as one of deprived region in Iran is the goal of this article for planning and leading necessary facilities to invest and decrease the imbalances. This article tries to rank the townships of Hormozgan Province in case of development degrees using factor analysis and 38 values of educational, cultural, fundamental and communicational degrees and tries to study them in equal groups in order to future planning and removing imbalances and organizing suitable space for scientific basic. The main hypotheses of this article are: 1. there is any imbalance and different disharmonic development between townships of Hormozgan province in case various indicators. 2. Most of the townships are in levels of less development and deprived. 3. Eastern townships are more deprived and less development than Western ones. 4. Development in province is poor and Bandar Abbas as the center of this Province has the most social facilities and services.   2- Methodology  According to the subject and components, this article is a combination of documentary-analytic and causal method. Statistical social of this article is all of 11 townships in the Province. In this article, after classification and information analysis, using statistical methods, factor analysis, cluster analysis lead to determine the development levels and degree of townships in the Province. First, with explanation of factor analysis technique and using SPSS.16 software, indices of studied subjects decrease to 5 factors and were showed as combination of factors. Then according to the results, and using cluster analysis, ranking the townships of Hormozgan province in equal and similar groups in case of development levels was done   3- Discussion  The result lessens 38 indices to 5 factors that finally cover 90.04 percent of variance. In other words, these 5 factors have been caused 90% differentiating place points. First factor: this factor called as an educational one. The value of this factor is 20/6 that individually can computes and explains the 51/7 percent of variance and in this factor there are 23 indices that have the most effectiveness among these 5 factors. Second factor: This factor can individually explains 12/94 of all variance and the value of this factor is 5/17. It was called cultural factor. Third factor: this factor is about 11/7 percent of variance and explains the different among places and the values of it is 4/406. It is communicational factor. Fourth factor: this factor explains 7/8 percent of variance and has the value of 3/15. It was called rural medical facilities. Fifth factor: this factor explains 6/3 of variance and has the value of 2/53. It was welfare factor. By comparison development levels, have been understood that Abomousa with score of 2/812 and jask with score of -3/79 are up and down in this level and it shows that there is a disharmonic and imbalance among townships. This result confirms our first hypotheses. Among these 11 townships, Abo Mousa, Parsian and Bandar Abbass with 39% of province population are more developed and Bastak, Lengeh and Haji Abad with 17% of province population are mid-developed and Khamir, roudan and Qeshm with 18% of province population are less developed and Minab and Jask with 24% of province population are deprived townships. This confirms second hypotheses. Minab and Jask with maximum of deprived degree are in the east of the province and as with going to the east the level of development lessen and this confirms third hypotheses. Bandar abbas as center of the province has 36% of province population and has score 2/731 that is in high level of development that confirms the fourth hypotheses. By affecting natural, economical, social and political factors, development in this province is imbalance and polar. Less suitable investment in eastern, western and northern places of the province has been caused some disharmonic and imbalances.   4- Conclusion  The results of this article showed that the development levels are imbalance and among the townships in Hormozgan, there is disharmonic in case of development level and degree and these differences are seen in different parts such as education, medical, culture, communication and welfare. Abo Mousa, Parsian and Bandar Abbas are more developed and Bastak, Lengeh and Haji Abad are mid-developed and Khamir, Roudan and Qeshm are less developed and Minab and Jask are deprived. Techniques of this article can cause the enrichment of current and organize the levels of developments in this Province.  Key Words : factor analysis, cluster analysis, index of development, level of development, Hormozgan Province.      References  Afsharsystany, I. (1999), the province of Hormozgan, Hirmand publications, Tehran.  Ahangary, A., M. Saadatmehr (2007), comparative studies of differentiates parts - economic and social development level of Lorestan province, science and Development, Vol. 21:11-26.  Amini, N., H. Yadollahi and S. Eynanlu (2006) ranking the health of the nation's provinces, scientific Journal - Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 20:27-48.  Assayesh, H., A.R. Estelaji (2003), methodologies for Area planning (models, methods and techniques), Islamic Azad University.  Bhtia, y. k., s. c. Rai(2004), evaluation of socio-economic development in small areas, Indian society of agricultural statistics, New Delhi.  Ebrahimzadeh, E., M. Eskandarisani, and M. Ismailnejad (2010), the application of factor analysis in explaining the spatial pattern of urban development and underdevelopment - a region of Iran, Geography and Development Vol. 17:7-28.  Ghaffari, A. (2004), the economic potential in Hormozgan province, Hormozgan, Senobar publisher.  Hekmatnia, H., M.N. Moosavi (2006), Model Application in geography with emphasis on urban and regional planning. Elmenovin publications of Yazd.  Hosseinzadehdalir, K. (2004), Regional Planning, samt publication, Tehran.  Joae, O. S., Maria Manuela L.M & Monteiro, F.(2001), A multivariate methodology to uncover regional disparities: a contribution to improve European :::::union::::: and government decisions, E.U.R, vol.145.  Jomehpour, M. (2006), An Introduction to: rural development planning: Approaches and methods, samt publisher, Tehran.  Kalantari, Kh. (2001), planning and regional development (theories and techniques), Tehran, khoshbeen publisher.  Kalantari, Kh. (2008), data processing and analysis in socio-economic research by SPSS software, Tehran: Sharif publication.  Kalantari, Kh. H. Iravani and M.SH. Vafaeinejad (2003), measurement of development levels in Torbathaidarieh Township, Geographical Research, Vol. 44:41-54.  Kerlynjer, F.(1997), Research in the Behavioral Sciences, translated by Sharifi, H.P., and Najafizand,J., avaye noor publication.  Khezri, M. (1997), evaluate and determine the degree of underdevelopment of Kurdistan province townships, MSc thesis, faculty of Economics. university of Isfahan.  Kleine, P. (2001) An easy guide to factor analysis, translation by Sadrossadat, S.J. and Minaie, A., S.M.T publisher, Tehran.  Management and Planning Organization of Hormozgan province(2006), Hormozgan Province Statistical Yearbook.  Management and Planning Organization of Hormozgan province(2007), Hormozgan Province Statistical Yearbook.  Mansourfar, K.,(2006), advanced statistical methods with computer programs, Tehran University Press.  Moosavi, M. N., H. Hekmatnia (2005), factor analysis and integration indexes in determine of affecting factors on Iran area development, Geography and Development Journal, Vol.6:55-70.  Noorbakhsh, F. (2003), human development and regional disparities in India, department of economics: university of Glasgow, no.21.  Rahnama, M. R. (1993), the classification of urban system and regional development in KHorasansan province, Geographical Research Quarterly No. 32.  Rezvani, M.R (2004), Measurement and analysis of development levels in Sanandaj township rural areas, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, Mashhad Ferdowsi University, No. 3.  Rezvani, M.R (2004), determining and analyze development levels in rural areas of Zanjan province, Geographical Research, Vol. 50:75-86.  Rondinelli,D.A.(1985),applied method of regional analysis, boulder and London,west view press. .  Talebi, H., A. zangiabadi (2001), analysis of factors and determining effective indicators in human development big cities, Geographical Research Quarterly, N. 60, Mashhad.  Taqvaee, M., S.H. Nourbakhsh and A. Zanghiabadi (2001), Classification of Chaharmahal Bakhtiari urban development by using factor analysis and cluster techniques, Sepehr, No. 62.  Tofigh, F. (1993), factor analysis and integration regional index, Journal of Village Number 10.  United Nations population fund(2002), indicators for population and reproductive health programmes, technical and policy division.  Yasury, M., (2009), Assessment of regional inequality in Khorasan Razavi Province, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, vol.12:201-223.  Ziari, K. (2009), Principles and Methods of Regional Planning, University of Tehran press.     
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله

نویسندگان مقاله محمد صبوری |


مسعود تقوایی |



نشانی اینترنتی http://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_18546_bf5945ff226cf9946f165e27140b853b.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/761/article-761-338669.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات