این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
مجله حقوقی بین المللی، جلد ۴۱، شماره ۷۶ ( زمستان)، صفحات ۰-۰
عنوان فارسی Territory, Jus ad Bellum: The Status of the Golan Heights in Light of the ۲۰۲۴ ICJ Advisory Opinion
چکیده فارسی مقاله This article examines the application of Articles 2(4) and 51 of the UN Charter in relation to Israel’s claim of sovereignty over the Golan Heights. Israel has cited historical Jewish rule and invoked “defensive conquest” to justify its position. However, this interpretation misrepresents the non-use of force principle. The article references relevant UN Security Council Resolutions and treaty interpretation rules, emphasizing a strict application of international law, which Israel has overlooked. The UN Charter’s main purpose of maintaining international peace supports this strict interpretation. Consequently, the notion of defensive conquest violates Article 2(4) and customary international law. Additionally, the article discusses the 2024 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion, which reaffirmed the illegality of Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights and highlighted the prohibition of acquiring territory by force, as established by the UN Charter.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله مخاصمه مسلحانه،ماده 49(1) پروتکل الحاقی اول،حمله،عمل خشونت‌آمیز،کنترل،قضیه انتاگاندا،دیوان بین‌المللی کیفری،
عنوان انگلیسی Territory, Jus ad Bellum: The Status of the Golan Heights in Light of the 2024 ICJ Advisory Opinion
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله This article examines the application of Articles 2(4) and 51 of the UN Charter in relation to Israel’s claim of sovereignty over the Golan Heights. Israel has cited historical Jewish rule and invoked “defensive conquest” to justify its position. However, this interpretation misrepresents the non-use of force principle. The article references relevant UN Security Council Resolutions and treaty interpretation rules, emphasizing a strict application of international law, which Israel has overlooked. The UN Charter’s main purpose of maintaining international peace supports this strict interpretation. Consequently, the notion of defensive conquest violates Article 2(4) and customary international law. Additionally, the article discusses the 2024 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion, which reaffirmed the illegality of Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights and highlighted the prohibition of acquiring territory by force, as established by the UN Charter.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Golan Heights,Jus ad bellum,Occupation,self defence,Use of Force
نویسندگان مقاله علی مسعودیان |
دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران

سحر خوشدل |
کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بین الملل عمومی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

نشانی اینترنتی https://www.cilamag.ir/article_717248_483219116d6e6393f88b9b387469fccf.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات