این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques، جلد ۱۴، شماره ۱، صفحات ۷-۱۵
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Comparison of retention in polyvinyl siloxane matrix systems versus conventional metal housing with nylon inserts in ball-retained mandibular implant overdentures
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Objective: This study compared the retentive performance of two polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) matrix systems (retention.sil 400 and 600) versus conventional metal housing with nylon inserts in ball-retained mandibular overdentures.Methods: Thirty ball-retained overdenture models were allocated into three groups based on the attachment system material (n=10): Group 1, conventional metal housing with nylon inserts; Group 2, retention.sil 400; and Group 3, retention.sil 600. A total of 1440 insertion-removal cycles, simulating one year of clinical use, were conducted at 50 mm/sec using a universal testing machine. Retention forces were measured at baseline (0 cycles) and after 360, 720, 1080, and 1440 cycles. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey's test at a significance level of P<0.05.Results: The conventional group showed the highest retention at all cycles. There were statistically significant differences in retention between the conventional group and both PVS groups at all cycles (P<0.001), but no significant differences were found between the two PVS groups (P>0.05). Absolute retention loss was significantly greater in the conventional metal housing with nylon inserts than in the two PVS groups (P<0.001). No significant difference was found in relative retention loss among the groups (P=0.108).Conclusions: Conventional metal housing with nylon inserts provided superior mean retention compared to the retention.sil 400 and retention.sil 600 matrix systems at all cycles, with no significant difference between the two PVS materials. The relative retention loss, however, did not significantly differ between the conventional group and PVS groups.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Dental abutments, Dental implants, Dental prosthesis retention, Denture precision attachment, Edentulous Jaw, Overlay denture
نویسندگان مقاله | Shrishti Bhardwaj
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.


| Lalit Kumar
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.


| Shefali Singla
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.


| Charnpreet Singh
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
نشانی اینترنتی https://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_25732.html
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده Original Article
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات