این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی، جلد ۲۲، شماره ۳۵، صفحات ۱۷-۲۸
عنوان فارسی Replication Infrequency: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics Editors
چکیده فارسی مقاله Replication studies play a crucial role in advancing scientific research, yet they are notably infrequent in applied linguistics (AL) journals. While editors serve as pivotal decision-makers in shaping academic publications, their perspectives on the scarcity of replication studies remain unexplored. This study aims to uncover insights from 27 editors-in-chief regarding the infrequency of replications in AL journals, shedding light on the challenges faced by replication research within the discipline. Thematic analysis revealed that editors identify a complex set of interrelated factors hindering the prevalence of replication studies, including predefined guidelines, limitations of academic journals, and an implicit bias towards impactful and original research. Further, editors recognize the critical role of replication in scientific research but emphasize that it is not a panacea for all research problems, urging its consideration as valuable tool alongside other rigorous research methods. These findings underscore the need for reform in the research culture of AL, advocating for increased replication studies and emphasizing transparency and rigor in research practices.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Replication Infrequency: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics Editors
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Replication studies play a crucial role in advancing scientific research, yet they are notably infrequent in applied linguistics (AL) journals. While editors serve as pivotal decision-makers in shaping academic publications, their perspectives on the scarcity of replication studies remain unexplored. This study aims to uncover insights from 27 editors-in-chief regarding the infrequency of replications in AL journals, shedding light on the challenges faced by replication research within the discipline. Thematic analysis revealed that editors identify a complex set of interrelated factors hindering the prevalence of replication studies, including predefined guidelines, limitations of academic journals, and an implicit bias towards impactful and original research. Further, editors recognize the critical role of replication in scientific research but emphasize that it is not a panacea for all research problems, urging its consideration as valuable tool alongside other rigorous research methods. These findings underscore the need for reform in the research culture of AL, advocating for increased replication studies and emphasizing transparency and rigor in research practices.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Applied Linguistics,Journal Editors,Publication Bias,Replication,Thematic Analysis
نویسندگان مقاله Zahra Banitalebi |
Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Farzaneh Hamidi |
Allameh Tabataba'i University

نشانی اینترنتی https://clls.sbu.ac.ir/article_105794_8ffadc337845f3bd65c319dabc9c0385.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات