این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
جستارهای زبانی، جلد ۱۳، شماره ۱، صفحات ۷۴۷-۷۸۳
عنوان فارسی اشراف چندگانه در ساختار بند موصولی مفعولی در زبان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله در این مقاله ساختار بند موصولی مفعولی در زبان فارسی و امکان ادغام متقارن یک گروه اسمی بین بند پایه و پیرو براساس مفهوم ادغام متقارن چیتکو (2011b) و ریمزدیجک (2006a) در زبان فارسی بررسی شد. بند موصولی مفعولی نوعی بند پیرو است که هستۀ آن در بند پایه و بند پیرو دارای نقش نحوی مفعول است. برای این منظور ابتدا مفهوم ادغام متقارن، ساختار بند موصولی مفعولی و ویژگی‌های آن براساس مفهوم ادغام متقارن و همچنین تقسیم‌بندی بند موصولی مفعولی به دو گروه دارای هسته و آزاد براساس چیتکو (2011b) توضیح داده شدند. داده‌های زبانی مختلف از زبان فارسی برای تحلیل کاربست مفاهیم مطرح‌شده توسط چیتکو (2011b) که شامل بندهای موصولی مختلف بودند، استفاده شدند. بررسی داده‌های زبانی نشان داد که تقسیم‌بندی بندهای موصولی مفعولی در زبان فارسی به دو گروه بند موصولی دارای هسته و آزاد براساس چیتکو (2011b) به‌طور کامل منطبق بر حقایق زبان فارسی نیست، زیرا در بندهای موصولی مفعولی آزاد معیار در زبان فارسی، سازۀ مشترک بین بند پایه و پیرو نمی‌تواند یک پرسش‌واژه باشد، زیرا در این شرایط جمله دارای خوانش سؤالی خواهد شد که این موضوع برخلاف یافته‌های چیتکو (ibid) است. دیگر نتایج این پژوهش نشان دادند که ویژگی‌های بند موصولی مفعولی در زبان فارسی مانند یکسان بودن نظام حالت، نقش دستوری و نقش معنایی گروه اسمی مشترک بین بند پایه و پیرو، حاکی از اشتراک این سازه بین بندهای پایه و پیرو و همچنین اشراف چندگانۀ دو فعل واژگانی بر آن است.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله بند موصولی مفعولی،ادغام متقارن،اشراف چندگانه،تطابق چندگانه،
عنوان انگلیسی Multi Dominance Structure in the Object-Object Relative Clause in Persian Language
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله In this paper the structure and the symmetric merge of a noun phrase in the matrix and dependent clauses of the object-object relative clause in Persian language was studied based on the notions of symmetric merge and multi dominance proposed by Citko (2011b) and the results of study by Riemsdijk (2006a). Different examples of relative clauses in Persian language were analyzed based on the notion of symmetric merge proposed by Citko (2011b). These analyses showed that the classification of relative clauses in Persian language into two groups of headed and free relative is not completely compatible with what has been proposed by Citko (2011b) since in Persian language if we use the wh-word as the head of free relative clause, it would contribute to making the sentence as a wh-question one which is against the findings of Citko (2011b) in English language. Moreover, the results of this research showed that the observed properties of the shared constituent between the matrix and dependent clauses of the object relative clause in Persian language namely as having the same case, syntactic function, and thematic roles proveed that this noun phrase is merged simultaneously between the two clauses and is a shared constituent between two lexical verb heads in the hierarchical structure of the sentence. This approach provides a clear and cost-free explanation for the characteristics of the shared element in the object relative clause in Persian language.
In this paper the structure and the merge of a noun phrase in the matrix and dependent clauses of the object-object relative clause in Persian language is studied based on the notions of symmetric merge and multi-dominance proposed by Citko (2011b) and the results of study by Riemsdijk (2006a). Chomsky (2001) proposed two kinds of merge namely as external merge and internal merge. Citko (2000, 2003, 2005 and 2011b) based on the practical evidence and properties of these types of merge proposed the third kind of merge operation namely as Parallel merge (symmetric merge) which is similar to External Merge in that it takes two distinct objects as its input and is also like Internal Merge in that it combines one with a subpart of the other.
The object-object relative clause (object relative clause) is a kind of free relative clause of which the nucleus has the syntactic role of objects in both the matrix and dependent clauses. In symmetric merge a constituent is merged simultaneously in two operations and is c-commanded by two different maximal projections.
The main question upon which this research was done was whether there is any evidence in support of symmetric merge of a constituent in structure of the object relative clause in Persian language. In this regard, different examples of relative clauses in Persian language were analyzed based on the notion of symmetric merge of a noun clause in the object relative clause proposed by Citko (2011b).
Citko (2011b, p.95) proposed that there are two kinds of relative clauses in English: headed and free relative clauses. This difference is illustrated in sentences one and two; the relative clause in sentence one is headed by the DP “the woman”, whereas the free relative in sentence two appears to either lack the head entirely or to be “headed” by the wh-phrase itself.
1. We hired the woman who (m) Mary recommended. headed relative
2. We hired whom Mary recommended. free relative
There are two views on the structure analysis of free relative clauses as the Comp Account and the Head Account. On the Comp Account, the head position is empty and the wh-phrase is in [Spec, CP], as argued by Caponigro (2003), Gračanin-Yüksek (2008), Groos and Van Riemsdijk (1981), Grosu (1994, 1996), and Grosu and Landman (1998), among many others (sentence 3). On the Head Account, the [Spec, CP] position is empty and the wh-phrase occupies the head position, as shown in (142b), as argued by Bresnan and Grimshaw (1978), Bury (2003), Citko
(2000, 2002, 2008b), Donati (2006) and Larson (1987, 1998), among others (sentence 4). Mary eats [DP O [CP what(ever) i [TP Bill cooks t i]]] Comp Account Mary eats [DP what (ever) i [CP [TP Bill cooks t i]]] Head Account Citko (2011b, p.96) classified the free object relative clauses into two groups based on the status of their head. Headed object relative clause in which the relative clause has a DP as the head (sentence 5) and the second one, the free object relative clause in which the relative clause has no head or a wh-phrase is its head (sentence 6).
5. We hired [the woman that Mary Recommended].
6. We hired [whom Mary recommended].
Citko (ibid) proposed that we have two kinds of free object relative clause namely as standard free relative and transparent free relative. After studying their internal structure, Citko (2011b, p.99) concluded that there is a symmetric merge in the structure of the standard and transparent free relative. In the standard free relative clause, the wh-phrase is shared constituent between the matrix and dependent clauses but in the transparent free relative clause, the semantic nucleus is a shared constituent between the matrix and dependent clauses.
Based on the findings of Citko (2011b) the relative clauses in Persian language analyzed and their properties were studied. These analyses showed that the classification of relative clauses in Persian language into two groups of headed and free relative is not completely compatible with what has been proposed by Citko (2011b) since in Persian language if we use the wh-word as the head of free relative clause, it would contribute to making the sentence as a wh-question one which is against the findings of Citko (2011b) in English language. The result of this research showed that the observed properties of the shared constituent between the matrix and dependent clauses of the object relative clause in Persian language namely as having the same case, syntactic function, and thematic roles proved that this noun phrase is merged simultaneously between the two clauses and is a shared constituent between two lexical verb heads in the hierarchical structure of the sentence. This approach provides a clear and cost-free explanation for the characteristics of the shared element in the object relative clause in Persian language.

کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله بند موصولی مفعولی,ادغام متقارن,اشراف چندگانه,تطابق چندگانه
نویسندگان مقاله سید مهدی ساداتی نوش آبادی |
دانشجوی دکتری زبان‌شناسی،‌ دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

مهدی سبزواری |
استادیار زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

نرجس بانو صبوری |
دانشیار زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

مزدک انوشه |
استادیار زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

نشانی اینترنتی https://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article_7020_bdba2fff5e92f7ec2176710dbde04c47.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات