This article examines Malekian's view on the relationship between reason and religion, focusing on the originality of reason and the reinterpretation of religion. Referring to the originality of reason, Malekian views faith as an unrealism and challenges the meaning and truth of religion by denying the supernatural. This view leads him to skepticism and relativity of meaning and the denial of worship and holiness in religion. 

  This article examines the theological and epistemological implications of his view using content analysis. The findings of the research show that the absurdist view of faith, the provability of religious statements, the symbolic nature of acts of worship, the misunderstanding of worship, and the fact that acts of worship are lacking evidence, not devoid of evidence, are among the criticisms leveled at his thought. 

  Despite these provisions and the criticisms made against it, this idea and approach lose their effectiveness when confronted with religion and revealed teachings.