این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
الهیات تطبیقی، جلد ۵، شماره ۱۱، صفحات ۵۷-۷۲
عنوان فارسی سازگاری جبر و اختیار نزد سازگارگرایان جدید غربی و ملاصدرا
چکیده فارسی مقاله مسأله جبر و اختیار (اجبار یا آزادی اراده انسانی) بعنوان یکی از مهم ترین و حیاتی ترین مسائل تاریخ اندیشه، همواره محل مواجهه طیف وسیع آراء متفکران بر له یا علیه اختیار آدمی بوده است. در این میان اندیشمندان سازگار گرا برآنند تا به ارائه مدلی از آزادی انسان بپردازند که در ضمن اجتناب از افراط های آزادی گرایان و جبر گرایان، سهم مؤثر عناصر هستی (خدا، انسان و جهان) را در امور عالم حفظ کند. در نوشتار حاضر به طرح و ارزیابی مدل پیشنهادی سازگار گرایان غربی و اسلامی از آزادی انسان پرداخته‌ایم؛ مدلی که چنانچه موفق ارزیابی شود، خواهد توانست به نزاع دیرینه آزادی و جبر پایان داده و سازگاری این دو سویه بظاهر ناسازگار را نشان دهد.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی The Compatibility of Free Will and Determinism in Modern Western Compatibilists and Mulla Sadra
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله The significance of determinism/ free will dilemma is clear by all enlightened mind as our approach in this regard has a straight influence on our theoretical worldview and scientific orientations in individual and social life. Determinism in general is a theory according to which human activities are necessary and so not free. Determinism (or causal determination) is one of the most important type of determinism which challenges human freedom by appealing to causal order of universe: all events in the universe – and among them all human acts- are exposed to causal rules, and also causation requires effects to be necessitated by their preceding conditions. And if this is the case, our freedom and responsibility for all our acts will be nullified; and now the problem is that if we are really free and responsible?    Throughout the history of ideas different answers have been given to this question:  libertarianists have sided by freedom and therefore declared determinism wrong and groundless at least in the domain of human actions; against them determinists relying on the findings of modern sciences like biology, biochemistry and neuroscience, have envisaged the universe under the authority of an absolute determination and thus rejected freedom and responsibility in favor of determinism; and compatibilists try to prove compatibility and reconcilability of determinism and freedom by any means they can.    In this essay we have accounted for the point that at an overall glance we can trace the history of free will/determinism dilemma back to the history of controversy on meanings and requirements of determinism and freedom in general; whereas deterministic and Libertarianistic approaches are after proving or rejecting a maximal freedom (freedom from all limitations even the necessities of human genes and environment), compatibilists have regarded this absolute freedom unintelligible and illusory, and improved and modified our expectations for being free and tried to explain a moderate notion of freedom which stands somewhere between the two extremes, i.e. between the minimalistic and maximalistic notions of freedom. Having analyzed the requirements of freedom into two general requirements of "Alternative Possibilities" and "Ultimate Responsibility", the author has turned to the aforementioned triple positions about this requirement (by highlighting the approaches of three western influential compatibilist Frankfurt, Peter Strawson and Wallace); by total or partial rejection of the mentioned requirements of freedom and then displaying replacements for it, compatibilists have revealed that probable governing of determinism on universe is not in conflict with human freedom. After analyzing different sides and points of this compatibilistic model of freedom, we turn to the analysis of the Islamic moderate notion of freedom and point out the accuracy and elegance of Mulla Sadra's interpretation of this type of freedom.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله یوسف شاقول |
دانشیار گروه فلسفه دانشگاه اصفهان
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه اصفهان (Isfahan university)

فخرالسادات علوی |
دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه دانشگاه اصفهان
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه اصفهان (Isfahan university)

نشانی اینترنتی http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_15752_1fe764ac5a1f4ba5a38809698ce7a1d4.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/610/article-610-433338.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات