| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
This research was conducted for the purpose of enhancing the development in universities and giving recommendations to the high ranking managers of universities by explaining leadership for academic work on the basis of knowledge management at state universities. Statistical population is consists of all the university's staff and faculty and 200 people, whom were chosen by the simple random sampling method and Cochran formula. Measurement tools are as follows: questionnaire with 12 items of knowledge management including knowledge creation, knowledge publication and knowledge use, with validity of 0.925, and also 57-items Ramsden's leadership in academic work instrument with marginal validity of 0.968 measured by Cronbach's alpha. For the validation of this questionnaire, construct validity and principal component analysis with varimax rotation were used. To answer the question that of what factors is the leadership in academic work instrument consisted, exploratory factor analysis was used. Primary output show that the 0.000001 correlation matrix determinant is a non-zero number, and the KMO is equal to 0.968, and the result of kerwit-Bartlett test with the value of 7017.8249 is still statistically significant in the level of less than 0.00001. After the elimination of items number 3, 11, 45 and reversing items 9 and 31 in the final output, factors extracted with PC method, were rotated by the varimax method. Eventually leadership in academic work with extracting 5 factors, and collection of items that were correlated with one factor and formed a trial were named: 1) target oriented 2) work oriented 3) persuasion oriented 4) understanding oriented 5) development oriented. All of these factors combined cover 62.5% of the total leadership in academic work variance. Statistical analysis shows that: 1) factors Target oriented and persuasion oriented elements are on an average level, but work oriented, understanding oriented, development oriented and leadership in academic work are more than average and high; using the single sample t-test. On the other hand, the level of factors knowledge creation and knowledge use are low in the population of the study, knowledge publication is high and knowledge management is average. 2) Using the Friedman model it is concluded that in the population of the study factor work oriented has the highest rate and factor persuasion oriented has the lowest rate among all. Also knowledge publication from knowledge management factors, has the highest rate and knowledge creation holds the lowest rate among all. 3) Using fundamental correlation model 3 contingency models were extracted, between knowledge management and leadership in academic work in the population of study. In the first model if age, service experience, knowledge creation, knowledge publication, and knowledge use have 0, 0, 5, 6, 0 coefficient, the 5 factors of leadership in academic work are predicted to have -6, 15, 2, 0, 3 coefficient. In model number 2, if age, service experience, knowledge creation, knowledge publication, knowledge use have 0, 0, 11, -14, 10 coefficients, factors of leadership in academic work are predicted to have 23, -16, 2, -3, 0 coefficient. In model number 3 if age, service experience, knowledge creation, knowledge publication, knowledge use have -1, 1, -6, 13, -3 coefficient, the 5 factors of leadership in academic work are predicted to have 5, -1, -5, 16, -16 coefficient. |