این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
دوشنبه 24 آذر 1404
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
، جلد ۲۱، شماره ۶، صفحات ۰-۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Comparison the effect of stump closure by endoclips versus endoloop on the duration of surgery and ?complications in patients under laparoscopic appendectomy: A randomized clinical trial
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-described surgical technique. However, concerns still exist regarding whether the closure of the appendiceal stump should be done with a clip, an endoloop, or other techniques. In this study, the effect of stump closure on duration of surgery and complications by endoclips was compared with endoloop in patients under laparoscopic appendectomy. The study was carried out as a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2013 and 2015 in Shariati Hospital of Tehran. Materials and Methods: Seventy-six patients under laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either endoclips or endoloop for stump closure. The results in terms of the operating time, length of hospital stay, and the complications were compared and analyzed between two groups. After collecting the essential data by using a checklist and examination of patients, the data were analyzed with SPSS. Results: The mean age was 23.13 ± 5.07 years and 44.7% of the patients were male. Moreover, in this study, it was seen that the mean duration of surgery was 23.2 min versus 21.5 min in endoloop and endoclips groups, respectively ( P = 0.021). There was no difference between hospital stay among two groups ( P > 0.05). Furthermore, the complications were same in two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: The effect of stump closure with endoloop versus endoclips is not different for complications, but the duration of surgery was shorter in endoclips method. Both methods could be used based on the opinion of the surgeon without expecting a statistically significant difference in the results.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
سید عباس سادات صفوی | seyed abbas sadat safavi
شیرزاد نصیری | shirzad nasiri
علی قربانی abdehgah | ali ghorbani abdehgah
ابوالفضل شجاعی فرد | abolfazl shojaiefard
محمد مهجوری | mohammad mahjoori
عارف کاشفی | aref kashefi
عامر عباس | amer abbas
مهدی جعفری | mahdi jafari
نشانی اینترنتی
http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/view/10498
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
Original Articles
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات