این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery، جلد ۱۰، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۵۳-۱۵۹
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Forearm Plate Fixation: Should Plates Be Removed?
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Background: Refracture after both bone forearm fracture fixation may vary with or without plate removal. We testedthe null hypothesis that there is no difference in the rate of refracture in patients who have undergone open reductionand internal fixation of a diaphyseal forearm bone who have retained implants versus removed implants. We alsostudied factors associated with plate removal.Methods: We retrospectively identified 645 adult patients with a total of 925 primary fractures that underwent primaryplate fixation of an ulnar or radial shaft fracture between 2002 and 2015 at a single institutional system. Patients withnon:union:, pathological fracture or infection were excluded. Independent factors associated with refracture and plateremoval were identified using multivariable analysis.Results: Refractures occurred in 6.3% of the fractures that had forearm implant removal, compared to 2.1% of thefractures with retained plates. Refractures were independently associated with plate removal (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.2-11.7, P=0.023) and was more frequent in the radius (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.0-5.8, P=0.06). A refracture after implantremoval occurred within 3 months after removal. Ulnar plates were removed more often compared to radial plates (OR:2.6, 95% CI: 1.4-4.7, P=0.002) as were plates used for type A fractures compared to type C fractures (OR: 3.2, 95%CI: 1.1-9.2, P=0.032).Conclusion: The rate of refracture is higher after plate removal compared to patients who did not have plates removed.Although uncommon, refractures of the radius tend to be more common than a refracture of the ulna. If the implant issymptomatic on the ulnar side, it may be preferable to remove the ulnar implant and retain the radius implant ratherthan remove both plates when possible. Furthermore, limiting strenuous activity for three months after implant removalis a consideration.Level of evidence: III
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله forearm, Fracture, implant removal, Osteosynthesis, plate removal, refracture
نویسندگان مقاله | Navapong Anantavorasakul
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA 2 Upper Extremity and Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit, Institute of Orthopaedics, Lerdsin Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand


| Jonathan Lans
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA


| Nicolaas Wolvetang
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA


| Erik T Walbeehm
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands


| Neal Chen
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
نشانی اینترنتی https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_18642.html
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده RESEARCH PAPER
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات