این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Medical Journal of Islamic Republic of Iran، جلد ۳۱، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۰۴-۱۰۹
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Assessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Background: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have significant advantages over conventional reviews in that all available data should be presented. This study aimed to evaluate Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis abstracts indexed in WOS and Scopus during 2003-2012 based on PRISMA checklist. Methods: This is an analytical study. We evaluated 46 article abstracts indexed in WOS, 89 article abstracts indexed in Scopus and 158 article abstracts indexed in WOS and Scopus both (overlapped group). The quality of the abstracts was evaluated according to the PRISMA checklist for abstracts. Some indicators including distribution per year, total citation, average citations per year, average citations per documents and average citations per year in each article were determined through searching the WOS and Scopus Databases' analytical section. Then, the correlations between the abstract's PRISMA scores, average citations per year, and publication year were calculated. Results: The abstract's quality is not desirable as far as the PRISMA criteria are concerned. In other words, none of the articles' abstracts is in line with the PRISMA items. The average of scores of the current study was 5.9 while the maximum score was 12. The PRISMA criteria showed the highest compliance with "Objectives" (98.6%), the second highest with "Synthesis of result" (85%) and "Title" (80.2%) and the lowest compliance with "Registration" (2%). There was a positive correlation between the compliance of PRISMA score and the average citations per year while there was a negative correlation between PRISMA score and the publication year. Conclusion: It seems that the suggested criteria for reporting Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis are not considered adequately by the writers and even scientific journal editors.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله مریم کازرانی | maryam kazerani
department of medical library and information sciences, faculty of paramedical sciences, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی (Shahid beheshti university of medical sciences)

عاطفه داودیان | atefeh davoudian
faculty of paramedical sciences, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی (Shahid beheshti university of medical sciences)

فرید زایری | farid zayeri
department of biostatistics, faculty of paramedical sciences, shahid beheshti univer-sity of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی (Shahid beheshti university of medical sciences)

حمید سوری | hamid soori
department of epidemiology, school of public health, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی (Shahid beheshti university of medical sciences)

نشانی اینترنتی http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2568-1&slc_lang=en&sid=en
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/18/article-18-418697.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده 1
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات