این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
دوشنبه 27 بهمن 1404
Teaching English Language
، جلد ۶، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۸۵-۱۹۶
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Quantitative, qualitative, or pragmatic: “Research potentials” for TEFL practitioners
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
The distinction often made between 'hard' and 'soft' sciences (Becher, 1989) is respectively associated with natural sciences and humanities. The terms are telling in that 'soft' often brings to mind a degree of detachment from real, objective, and worthwhile research, while 'hard' is often associated with reliable research. In hard sciences, quantitative methods are often used to ensure objectivity, while qualitative methods are often associated with 'soft' disciplines. Within the Iranian context, such connotations of the terms 'soft' and 'hard' have led to the rise of the status of quantitative methods at the expense of qualitative ones. This is particularly noticeable amongst TEFL practitioners in Iran, where some gatekeepers totally disapprove of qualitative research. Such beliefs are situated in epistemological underpinnings of our discipline which is historically rooted in positivism. It is interesting to note that TEFL can be situated amongst the social sciences/humanities fields, and it seems that such fields should not necessarily follow in the footsteps of natural sciences and should instead have their own specific methodologies (Griffiths, 1998). In this paper, which can best be categorized as a call for Iranian TEFL practitioners to put research objectives before research methodological techniques, I will attempt to briefly explain the epistemological underpinnings of these two paradigms, and I will argue that we should rethink this methodological distinction and take a more pragmatic stance with regard to our research problems. I will also refer to three research studies as examples of purely quantitative, purely qualitative, and pragmatic with respect to research techniques.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
Mostafa Hasrati |
Razi University
نشانی اینترنتی
http://www.teljournal.org/article_54925_474e3ee205de4389461b03fab3c4bd58.pdf
فایل مقاله
اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/539/article-539-592930.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات